Going to Comic-Com

June 30th, 2009

Yes, that’s right, I’m going to the fanboy mecca this summer.

Comic-Con-Logo.png

After glancing yesterday’s news, it seems like I should expect a giant press event from the major broadcasters peddling any of their shows that might possibly have a geeky male audience.

Hey, hold on, I’m not trying to be snarky but why there hell will there be a GLEE press event? Do we have to provide our own cabbages?

(Dark Tony’s Conscience: That one goes out to my buddy, Mr. Big Hollywood Producer.)

(Tony’s Conscience: No, no, no! Don’t go negative. Stay positive. There’ll be a FRINGE event. Your TV crush Anna Torv might be there. Sure, you probably have a better chance of talking to her at the Sunset Coffee Bean but…)

Okay, anyone that’s gone before, what should I do? What should I expected? What kind of trouble can I get into and will she be wearing a Princess Lea bikini from RETURN OF THE JEDI?

The Hangover

June 29th, 2009

Vegas, oh the myriad of stupid things we have done inside your city limits. I’d share but there’s a suicide pact that prevents me from saying any more (and don’t even get me started on Reno). With this film, we have yet another ode to male folly in Sin City.

the-hangover.jpg

Does this film break any new ground? Nope. Is it funny? Yup. Why? Because it isn’t afraid to bare some of its fangs. In a Hollywood that plays everything well inside the safe zone, this movie doesn’t blink from exposing you to the infantile male id run rampant… yet it’s not nearly as profound as I just made it seem. Just sit back, have another shot of Patron and be sure to take a lot of dollar bills with ya.

The Oscar 10

June 26th, 2009

By now you’ve heard that next year’s Oscars will allow 10 nominees for best picture. Regardless if this ends up being a good idea or bad idea, we are half way through the year so we should have at least one contender, right? As I’ve seen 42 theatrical releases this year, I will suggest three possible contenders.

Of the movies I’ve seen this year, my three Oscar hopefuls are:

  • Up - Because it’s about time Pixar gets a nod.
  • Star Trek - I don’t think we will see a better big budget action flick this year.
  • Due to my NDA I can’t say anything (yet) but this movie comes out this summer and I think you’ll like this one.
  • BTW, it was much harder to pick three possibilities than I originally imagined.

    On a tangent, it’s been one hell of a week for celebrity deaths. We lost Ed McMahon who gave us this awesome point of reference.

    We lost Farrah Fawcett who advanced mainstream cheesecake (as well as many a young boy’s adolescence) thanks to this poster.

    farrah-fawcett-poster

    And finally we lost the King of Pop who, as a friend said, gave us dance moves you can quote. Here’s a video directed by my man Marty.

    Michael Jackson - New Music - More Music Videos

    Watch The Titles

    June 25th, 2009

    Recently, the Hammer Museum along with Flux and Forget The Film, Watch The Titles held a one night lecture/presentation by some of today’s most talented motion picture title designers. Those speaking included:

    Danny Yount

    Jamie Caliri

    Karin Fong

    Garson Yu

    And without a doubt the most recognized name in title design since Saul Bass helped make Hitchcock that much more memorable, Kyle Cooper

    Generally speaking, these guys and gal are much better at letting their work do the talking for them. I couldn’t believe one designer brought in a PowerPoint presentation called “What is Art” but easily it was Kyle’s “brain map” that stole the show. It was so intricate It’s almost impossible to describe but here I go: imagine a beautifully designed brainstorming session (you know, the kind you map out with bubbles and lines on a whiteboard) and then imagine that that every bit of text was a hyperlink that opened up another series of links. Yeah, the audience gasped when we realized just how deep we were going into Kyle’s mind. Guess that’s why he’s the unquestioned genius of his medium.

    Martini Shot

    June 24th, 2009

    At some point just after getting my first iPod, I got hooked on podcasts (this was way before iTunes could handle podcasts. This was a time when Adam Curry was still king of the medium).

    Since then, I’ve come to love quite a few podcasts and this is one of them.

    Why Martini Shot? Not only am I amused by Rob Long’s industry insider observations but as of late I’ve found some strange synchronicity between his musings and my life. Take the above episode for example. Just this week I’ve had a surge in unsolicited “you know what you should do?” advice. I know, it’s like a horoscope or fortune cookies (you’ll find the connections you want to make) but I’m not about to start pitching a reality rom-com with “wedding” in the title. Thank you, but no.

    (Yes, that happened to me this week while quietly sitting in my seat waiting for a work [non-industry] function to begin.)

    Drag Me to Hell

    June 23rd, 2009

    DRAG ME TO HELL is pure schlock and I mean that as high praise.

    Alison_DM2H.jpg

    Before Sam Raimi peddled the heroic with his SPIDER-MAN franchise, he tickled the grotesque with his three EVIL DEAD movies. With this film Raimi returns to those roots by crafting an equally hysterical and horrifying flick (BTW, I’m so tired of torture porn) that kicks off with a home foreclosure.

    Quick tangent: while some reporters are all too keen to describe this film as a condemnation/commentary on the home foreclosure crisis, Raimi keeps insisting that the film is simply about unchecked greed and how it spoils the soul.

    Allow me another tangent. Ellen Page was originally cast in the lead role but dropped out due to scheduling conflicts. While Alison Lohman does a fine job, I felt like the filmmakers could have gone in a different direction. Instead of casting an actresses that embodies innocence, why not someone a bit more impish, a bit more mischievous? I’m thinking of a Parker Posey type. This would have given the film’s moral stance (and it is a VERY moral film) stronger legs to stand on.

    If you like your horror flicks with a side of cheese, then this is the perfect dish for you (although I wouldn’t see the movie on a full stomach).

    Timecode Mismatch

    June 20th, 2009

    I’ve run into a post-production issue and I need to call upon the hive mind for help.

    My film was shot on the HVX200 @ 1080/24pA (23.98) and the audio was recorded into a Sound Devices 702T as Wave Files (WAV). We jam synced both devices and also used a timecode (TC) slate. We then fed the audio out of the 702T and back into the HVX200 via the camera’s XLR inputs.

    As the footage was transferred from the P2 cards and ingested into Final Cut Pro (FCP), we ended up with clips that had one video track and four audio tracks (a doubling of our stereo audio feed from the 702T, I believe).

    clip-timeline

    Now, I was always told that I’d need to take my FCP ingested clips, rip out the four tracks of audio, import the original stereo 702T WAV files, sync audio to picture, lock the new clip and repeat until done. Why do this? So I can use the “better” audio.

    For anyone that has ever had to sync hours of footage, you know this sucks big time. But that’s why we jam sync the TC; it’s supposed to make this whole procedure less painful. Plus Sam from the Confidence Bay showed me an awesome way to use QuicKeys to cut tens (if not hundreds) of hours out of this process.

    Perfect. I’m ready. I’m excited. I’m dying to sync all this footage so I can hand it over to my new kick ass editor.

    Just one problem: the audio and image use two different TC counts.

    The WAVs use a 24 (23.98) TC count (check out the TC in the top right window).

    audio-fr23-hl

    audio-fr24-hl

    The HVX200 footage, well, that’s a complicated story. If I recall properly, 1080 24pA DVCproHD footage is recorded to the P2 cards as 29.97. Then, in FCP, you ingest using the advanced pulldown setting and TADA, you have 23.98 clips. Unfortunately, what I found is that the 23.98 footage still uses a 29.97 count. I kid you not. A 23.98 clip counts up to frame 29. The TC doesn’t convert to a 24 count.

    image-fr29-hl

    image-fr30-hl

    And here’s the proof that 1) the clip is 23.98 and 2) that the sequence is set to cut 23.98 footage.

    image-item-properties-hl

    sequence-settings-2398-hl

    Do you see my problem? I have one chunk of media that counts from 0-23 and another that counts from 0-29 and I’m supposed to use their respective TC to sync them together. “00:00:00:27″ in the footage is “00:00:01:03″ in the audio. Without resolving this discrepancy in counting, I can’t see a way to have FCP automatically sync the audio and image via TC.

    How do I easily resolve this so I don’t spend the next month syncing my footage? Is there a way to resolve this discrepancy without 1) a massive re-ingesting of all the footage or 2) paying for some expensive hardware transcoding? Should I even bother with this now? Is the the audio routed from the 702T to the HVX200 via XLR that much worse than the original WAV files? Would it be simpler to just clone a drive for my editor now and deal with this problem after I’ve locked the cut? This violates the “5 minutes now saves you 5 hours (or days) later” rule I learned from my buddy Ken but maybe this is one where I just have to suck it up and sync the WAVs to the edited picture (that might take a month as well).

    Thoughts? Questions? Solutions?

    Hulu Desktop

    June 18th, 2009

    I’ve been trying out the new Hulu application for the Mac and it isn’t half bad.

    huu-desktop_lg

    It’s nice that you can control the app with the Apple remote but you can’t re-order shows or delete them from cue from within the application. You can only do that from the Hulu website. Also, the system requirements are pretty steep but I seem to do fine with my 1.2 Mbps home wireless download speed (2 Mbps is recommended).

    Is this just a glorified viewer? Yes. Is it smoother than the old Joost application? I think so (I can’t really remember that old app). Will I use this application over their website? I think so. What about you?

    (And yes, this was yet another shameless excuse to spotlight my latest TV crush, Anna Torv)

    Up

    June 17th, 2009

    Goddamn it, Pixar does it again.

    UP-house.jpg

    This film is just awesome. Somehow you get a trippy animated adventure film that also manages to examine the darkness that festers in men’s hearts, hearts congested with loneliness, anger and obsession.

    And yes, it is 3-D but the film employs none of the typical 3-D gags. Honestly, I can’t believe the number of people I’ve heard complain about this. I think this is what 3-D will be like when (if) most films adopt the technology. Like sound, color and Cinemascope, the medium will find subtle ways to blend this technology into the storytelling.

    Oh, and how I adored that opening montage. Damn, Pixar really knows how to do silent film right.

    New Kid In Town

    June 16th, 2009

    So there’s a lot of hoopla surrounding the announcement of a new independent film studio. DF Indie Studios has collected a consortium of producers with the goal of outputting up to a dozen commercially viable films with budgets as high as $10 million. Not only will they produce these quality films at the right price but they also promise theatrical distribution with complete P&A support.

    Um, so what exactly is their definition of a “commercially viable film”? I’m guessing they’ll put out a grip of horror films, an action thriller or two, a handful of star-driven dramas that’ll serve as Oscar bait and some ultra-low budget comedies. How daring will they be? Well, their motto is “indie style, studio dependability” so your guess is as good as mine.