Posts Tagged ‘Amazon’

 

Amazon Wants Your Best For Nothing – 24. November, 2010

By now you’ve heard that Amazon wants to start making movies and they’re gonna give everyone a shot? And they’ve got money.

So far, sounds good.

You can either submit a script or a “test film”.

Okay, but WTF is a “test film”? It’s a video rough draft of your film. It has to be at least 70 minutes long and include “great acting and sound but not theatrical-quality production values.”

And then people can vote if they like your stuff.

Ooh, that sounds too much like YouTube and really, who wants a feature film of a fat kid playing with his lightsaber or of a cute kitten getting tickled?

And these people of the internet can also rewrite your script and make it better.

Yes, because that’s how you retain a singular, unique voice.

And once you submit your project, Amazon has an exclusive, free option to your material for up to three years.

What? Help! Fire! Robbery!

Ugh.

Yes, it’s all true. Amazon wants your best ideas, no, scratch that, they want a finished script, or better yet they want you to make the movie, they want to post it on the web, they want other people to rewrite you, they want everyone to vote their opinion, they want to shop your script to Warner Brothers (or anyone else if WB passes) and they want three years of exclusive ownership to your script. And for this they’re gonna pay you zero dollars.

Are they f**king crazy? How is this a good idea?

But what really gets me is that Amazon does all of this while proclaiming itself the new new, egalitarian alternative to Hollywood’s notoriously closed doors. Yes, in the same way that child workers are an alternative to high costs skilled labor. This is just a terrible idea and I don’t see any way I’d ever willingly participate.

Sigh.

Posted in Industry

Singing Her Lungs Out – 12. May, 2010

I thought everyone knew about this woman but if you don’t here’s your chance.

Today only, Amazon is selling the MP3 version of “Lungs” by Florence + The Machine for $3.99.

Lungs_Flo-Machines.jpg

You can thank me by leaving a review here.

Posted in Off-Topic

21 July 2009 Update – 21. July, 2009

A quick what-I’ve-been-up-to-and-will-be-up-to:

  • Mailed off my TSCC spec to the Warner Bros Writers Workshop.
  • Recorded character voices for my Amazon spec. Thanks to Curtiss, Dan, Karina & Michael.
  • Gathering supplies for stop motion/live action shoot. Still need 1GB CF card, Nikon DSLR battery, HDV tape, wire (is that crafts store or hardware store?) and sleep.
  • Still need to plan my Comic-Con. Marcos, Tina, David G., expect an email from me. Anyone else want to offer advice or let me know what I should check out?
  • Beat the heat. So hot in my room yesterday that I lost a couple pounds and my hand started trembling.
  • And so ends today’s update. FYI, I’ll try to blog more consistently from Comic-Con. Over and out.

    Netflix Cracks the Matrix – 10. July, 2009

    Netflix_Logo.png

    Back in 2006, Netflix offered a $1 million bounty for any team that could improve their Cinematch algorithm by 10%. If I remember correctly, a Netflix honcho called that 10% the “NAPOLEON DYNAMITE anomaly” because, well, here’s what I remember him saying.

    “If someone rents and loves NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET and SAW, we can successfully suggest WOLF CREEK to them. If someone rents and loves PRIDE & PREJUDICE and REMAINS OF THE DAY then we can successfully suggest SHADOWLANDS to them. If someone rents and loves THE SIMPSONS and FAMILY GUY, we can successfully suggest THE OBLONGS to them. The anomy is that each of the above renters also check out NAPOLEON DYNAMITE and give it 5 stars. We want to predict that.”

    It looks like someone finally did it. It took two teams combining their coding abilities, and the results still need to be verified, but I think we have a winner.

    Or do we? The most interesting part of that Cinematical article is the question of Prize economics. See, by Netflix offering a prize to the winner, they get a lot of people working on their very specific problem, one that, if solved, would hypothetically generate more revenue for Netflix, for free. While this is a boon to the winners, couldn’t Netflix get the same results by hiring some coders, paying them a salary and offering them health benefits? Need another example of this? How about the Amazon contest for a user generated 30-second commercial that they plan to air on the major networks. What does the winner receive? One, possibly two, $10k gift certificates. Basically, you trade your winnings back to Amazon. Um, hey, look, if I had more time I’d enter but isn’t that just a bit fishy?

    Or maybe I’m just getting all worked up since I have so little work at the moment.

    Posted in General