Archive for the ‘Post-Production’ Category

 

Field Dominance & Stills – 14. June, 2009

I just wrapped a gig and had the strangest issue pop up. I’m gonna share in the hopes that someone out there might be able to shed some light.

The gig: I was hired to edit a Spanish language medical video. The project was shot on the HVX200,1080i, 29.97 fps. I was using the latest version of Final Cut Pro (FCP). As the edit progressed, I was also given some animations (HD QT), layered Photoshop images, TIFF drop-ins to replace corrupted frames and 4K JPG stills from a DSLR. The final delivery was a high-quality SD DVD for client approval and then a native (1080 DVCproHD) QT to be sent to the DVD replication house.

Everything worked wonderfully until I started doing some minor color correction with Colorista. At this point I learned that my new favorite plugin (which I like much more than FCP’s 3-Way Color Corrector) is GPU based and as I’m editing on a 2.33 GHz MacBook Pro with 3GB RAM, the plugin can’t handle 4K JPG stills.

Okay, a minor setback but I had a solution. I only had two sequences of stills, one to open the industrial and one to close it.  Solution: why don’t I export each sequence of stills as a native DVCproHD QT. I’ll then re-import these two QT clips into my project, apply Colorista, export and I’m golden.

Not quite. I first noticed a problem after I exported my final edit (the full industrial with the two 4K JPG stills sequences transcoded to DVCproHD) via Compressor for DVD Studio Pro (DVDSP). The “closing” QT stills clip wound up looking like this:

bad-pp

Here I should note that 1) the rest of the industrial looked perfect and 2) both 4K JPG still sequences were exported with the exact same settings:

sequence-settings.png

These settings matched the original DVCproHD sequence settings perfectly, but I only had issues with one of the QT stills clips, not both. Also, the problem only cropped up when exporting from FCP. The entire industrial looked great in FCP.

Time to trouble shoot.  First I thought it must be Colorista. I removed the plugin, exported the corruption-prone section of my final edit to QT but the resulting clip still had the same problem.  I went back to the original 4K JPG stills sequence and tried exporting another DVCproHD QT with the hope that it was a one-off issue.  Nope.  I tried different export settings but still had the exact same stumbling block.

Again, I went back to my original 4K JPG stills. As the problem looked like a field dominance issue, I tried exporting another DVCproHD QT movie with one exception–I set the field dominance to “none”:

sequence-settings-fdn.png

I then imported this closing QT stills clip with the field dominance set to “none” into my final edit project and something weird happened. The QT stills clip suddenly had its field dominance set to “upper” (which is what the HD video was set to):

item-properties-whl.png

Okay, I started to freak out but my inner empiricist convinced me to follow through with my experiment. I applied Colorista to this new QT stills clip and exported the entire final edit to a native DVCproHD QT. Bingo, it worked:

good-pp.png

I then sent the sequence to DVD SP via Compressor and that worked too.

Why? I have no idea. Do you?

Posted in Post-Production

Consult This: Music Rights – 11. June, 2009

Dan Wilcox, KCRW DJ and Music Supervisor, held a small lecture about music rights for movies at Film Independent and it was… well, here’s what I learned.

  • For a low-budget film, the music supervisor’s salary could be anywhere from $4-10k but that is, like everything else, negotiable.
  • When licensing a pop song, there are two sets of rights to deal with. First, there are the master rights, sometimes called the sync license. This allows you to play the performance. Next, you have to acquire the publishing rights. This allows you to perform the song. Confused? Let’s use “All Along The Watchtower” as an example. Bob Dylan wrote the song so you need to secure the publishing rights from him. But let’s also say you want to use the Jimi Hendrix version so you need a sync license from his estate.
  • Sometimes you can acquire rights as a step deal where you pay a small fee for each step (festivals, theatrical, DVD, etc.). According to Dan, this is almost always a bad idea. You’ll end up paying more in the end and distributors will treat you as if you have the plague.
  • Expect to pay 30-50% more if you’re using the song over the opening or closing credits.
  • Two sites you should become acquainted with: BMI and ASCAP.
  • Some labels/publishers/ariststs have a “most favored nations” clause in their contract. This basically says that everyone gets paid the same. Try and talk folks out of this if you plan on using one super popular song. Imagine your film features 9 songs by unknowns. You agree to $5k for each song but there’s a “most favored nations” clause. Now, for your 10th song, you license a Rolling Stones track for $500k. Guess what? Suddenly you’re paying $500k per song for each of the 10 songs.
  • Try using something in the public domain.
  • Truth is, I knew most of this stuff from previous attempts to license pop songs. Those experiences were so painful I’ve had an aversion to licensing popular music since. But who knows, maybe with this next movie I might try it again. There’s this one song I feel I gotta have and, well, what the heart desires, right?

    On a final note, let me leave you with one of Dan’s sets.

    How Did They Do That – 3. June, 2009

    Thanks to a friend on Twitter, I stumbled upon this:

    What’s sweetest about this spec spot is that they show you how they did it with Final Cut Pro and After Effects.

    I don’t know about you but I always find process fascinating.

    Posted in Post-Production

    Clients vs. Vendors – 27. May, 2009

    Thanks to Shane Ross for turning me on to this.

    Funny thing is, I’ve been on both sides of this awkward conversation. It’s the industry. Some haggling is expected. And we all have our “Tiffany” pricing and our “For Friends” price. That’s how a 2-person relationship drama with less than a dozen locations can cost anywhere from $25 million to $250,000.

    I would hope that when I’m asking for a discount/freebie, I’m humble and understanding and when I offer to trade favors, I mean it.

    Also, this video highlights one of my biggest pet peeves but I won’t say which in case some of my clients are reading this.

    Beer Short #3 – 7. March, 2009

    Here’s the third web video I’ve edited for the documentary BEER WARS. Enjoy.

    Posted in Post-Production

    Cutting Short Stuff – 2. March, 2009

    Those of you that have met me know that I work more jobs than the Jamaican family from IN LIVING COLOR. Recently, I’ve been editing web videos for a film that launches next month. Here are the first two pieces that I’ve cut.

    These shorts are for BEER WARS, a documentary I’ve been helping out on for the last three years. The film shows on over 400 screens on April 16 as part of an event which includes a panel with some prominent American craft brewers including my hero, Sam Calagione of Dogfish Head Brewery.

    Posted in Post-Production

    FFD Seeking UCE For Fun Times In Dark Rooms, Possibly More – 10. February, 2009

    Before you perverts get all hot and bothered, let me decipher that headline: “First-time Feature Director seeking Up and Coming Editor to (co)edit no-budget feature.”

    In the time since I’ve shot my film, I’ve come to realize this – I don’t have the time to edit my film myself. I’m working three job just trying to tread water plus my attention keeps getting diverted to other projects. Also, I need fresh eyes on this film. Yes, I’m a good editor but I don’t think I should be editing my own film. I need an objective opinion, or at least a second opinion. I’m willing to enter a co-editing situation, I just need a kindred soul to help see me through.

    So who is my idea candidate? I’m looking for someone cool and by cool I mean chill and intelligent and a good fit for me, my compliment. In short, I’m looking for my Thelma.

    thelma_marty.jpg

    So if you’re a reader of this blog and we’ve worked together in the past or we went to school or we chatted at a festival or met at a party and you’re an editor, drop me a line.

    Note: please don’t repost this w/o my prior consent. This is not an open job listing. I’m strictly looking for folks I know or referrals from peeps I trust. I don’t want everyone and their mother to send me their reels (and yes, I said this is a “no-budget” feature).

    Importing HVX Footage into Final Cut Pro – 28. January, 2009

    As I’ve had a few requests, I’ve decided to post instructions for importing footage shot w/ the Panasonic HVX200 into Final Cut Pro.  I created this document for my DIT.

    For reference:

    Lastly, you should know that I culled this from Creative Cow and Shane Ross, an editor I once worked with.

    Best of luck.

    Turn Off That iPhone – 2. January, 2009

    While editing a PSA for a national women’s health clinic I’ve run into an audio issue, one that manifests itself exactly as on my film. In both cases there’s a noticeable buzz on the recorded production track and I’m suspecting it’s related to these guys:

    iphone.jpg

    In my film, it takes place during a scene shot in a bathroom. On that set, there were at least 3 iPhones I was aware of. On this PSA, the set was a small office and I counted at least 6 iPhones.

    Now I know cell phones can cause speakers to buzz but in all my years of post-production I’ve never had this buzz show up on a digitally recorded track.

    Have any of you noticed issues when recording audio to an HVX200? What about to a stand-alone recorder? Have any of you noticed this related to iPhones within close proximity of the recording device?

    Regardless, the next time I’m on set I’m asking everyone to put their cells (iPhone or otherwise) in a room far from set and far from the production mixer.

    Posted in Post-Production

    “Tech Talk: Deliverables” – Post Postproduction – 20. November, 2007

    … or the myth of the $7,000 film.

    (You do remember Rocky & Bullwinkle, right?)

    Film Independent sought to demystify the world of deliverables with help from Patrick Canedey from ElektroFilm as well as a young lady from Lions Gate and an older woman – I think she was from Union Station Media but I forgot to write that down. I can’t speak for all in attendance but I felt like I was scared straight (regarding deliverables, that is).

    Truth is, no doe-eyed filmmaker ever thinks about deliverables until they’ve sold their film at SXSW and they’re scrutinizing the contract on the plane ride home. That’s when they wonder, “why do I have to deliver 3 HD masters , 3 NTSC masters and 3 PAL masters… and why the hell do I have to pay for them out of my pocket?!”

    In short, deliverables are all the materials you hand over to your distributor so they can get your movie in front of an audience. As I am no expert in this field, and as this is a highly technical topic, I’m gonna jump WAY back and explain some of the basics in very broad strokes.

    HD vs SD – In a world where high definition cameras are getting cheaper (you can now buy a 24p HDV camera for just under a grand), everyone wants you to deliver an HD master. From the HD master, high quality standard definition down converts can be created. So it’s cool to deliver an Apple ProRes 422 Quick Time of your movie? No. Distributors want HDCAM SR, HDCAM or D5.

    NTSC vs PAL (and sometimes SECAM) – There are different television systems throughout the world and it’s for the same reason you need that wacky converter when you want to plug your American hair blow dryer into a Parisian outlet. That’s why none of your friends can play that DVD of LOST HIGWAY you bought in England.

    Speaking of DVDs, what’s the deal with regions?

    (deep breath)

    Regions were created to stave off piracy and to preserve the distinctions between sales territories. For now I’ll say that the US is region 1, that LOST HIGHWAY DVD is region 2, my cousins in Colombia have a region 4 player and that girl from China that keeps bugging me needs to learn that her region 6 DVDs will never work on my home system.

    Plan on selling your movie to German television? Then you better have a 4×3, 1.33:1 D5 with a full M & E comp mix on channels 3 & 4 and it better not blow the IRE or the headroom.

    Is your head spinning yet? Let’s explain.

    4×3 refers to the size of the frame. That rinky-dink television your Grandma owns has a 4×3 frame size. The bitchin’ LCD monitor you bought with your bonus, that’s 16×9.

    1.33:1 refers to the size of the image (note the distinction between frame vs image size). When your Nana watches the edited for TV version of GOODFELLAS on CBS, the image is taking up the entire frame of her television. When your Grandma borrows your re-issued DVD of GOODFELLAS, she’s gonna see black bars top and bottom. Why? Because Warner Brothers is preserving the original aspect ratio of Scorsese’s masterpiece. Why don’t you see those bars on your LCD monitor? Because your 16×9 television closely approximates the 1.85:1 aspect ratio Scorsese was working with (now some of you smart monkeys are saying, “doesn’t 16×9 = 1.78:1?” and I’m just gonna say that we’re Americans and we like making things hard for ourselves and others).

    D5 refers to the tape (as opposed to HDCAM SR or HDCAM) you deliver.

    Full M & E comp refers to the music and sound effects tracks that have been mixed together. Why are you delivering a mix w/ only music and effects to Germany? Because German actors are gonna dub your dialog. Hey, your German Auntie, her eyes aren’t so good anymore so she can’t really read subtitles, especially not on her rinky-dink TV. Maybe you should buy her a nicer one for Christmas… but I digress.

    So why is this mix delivered on channels 3 & 4 and not 1 & 2? Because those channels have your discreet English language dialog mix (just incase the German version of IFC wants to show your film as you originally intended).

    IRE & Headroom refer to brightness and loudness tolerances. If your image is too bright or the sound is so loud it distorts, your German television distributor will return your tape and refuse to pay you until you fix these issues.

    I know this seems overwhelming but it’s important to remember that you’re not done once you lock picture or mix your sound. There is a post postproduction to consider.

    As for the myth of the $7,000 film, I hope it’s dawned on you that $7,000 might be enough to lock picture or even mix your sound but all these additional deliverables can really add up. Most $7,000 films incur $50k-$200k in additional costs and that’s coming out of your advance. But, as suggested in my triangle of independent filmmaking, if you have time and you plan ahead, you can keep these costs reasonable.

    Enough of my geek ramblings. Go out and make a film! :)