Archive for the ‘Education’ Category

 

DIY Days LA 2009: Wrap Up – 23. November, 2009

“Welcome to the future. Nothing is as it was. Everything is new so no one knows anything.”

In a sense, that was the working thesis for the recent DIY Days in Los Angeles. I’m not bashing the event. Truly, we’re at a time of cutting edge change and what’s true today might be bunk tomorrow. Plus, as my mama always said, “seek those that seek the truth, distrust those that claim to have found it” but I digress. These speakers gave us a snapshot of where we are and what the future might hold. What follows is a seminar by seminar review of the night.

Social Media for Storytellers
Lance gave us a brief introduction and overview of social media. As always, Lance was clear, concise and inspiring.

Loveland
I gotta say, I thought this talk was total bulls**t when it started. Jerry Paffendorf seemed disorganized and discombobulated on stage. By the end, I was completely charmed and I wanted to invest in LOVELAND. Hey, Jerry, so there’s a mayor of LOVELAND? Can I get a title? Make me the “Ambassador of Fun” and I’ll invest $35. Deal?

DIY and Why?
I took at class with Jon Reiss at Film Independent earlier this fall and it has to be one of the best I’ve ever taken there. Go buy his book. It’s a must for any and all truly independent filmmakers.

Evolution of Storytelling
In the past year I’ve become a bit obsessed with transmedia (damn, I hate that term. I want “multi-medium” to catch on). I love the idea but have been a bit… I wasn’t entirely sure how to get a good grasp on it. Jesse Alexander and Elan Lee did an awesome job of giving us a good overview. Also, they got me to try my first game. Not bad but the ending just fizzled; maybe it was a technical glitch with my experience.

The Art and Craft of the ARG
So if Jesse and Elan provided a wonderful bird’s eye view of alternate reality games, Steve Peters and Jan Libby took us down a rabbit hole so deep I couldn’t make heads or tails of this talk; I think Lance should have moderated this talk. Regardless, it’s obvious I should try my first ARG, especially if I want to develop one for my multi-medium project.

Personal Brands
Marc Horowitz had some interesting things to say but I was taken by Micki Krimmel. She’s engaging, genuine, and turned her internet celebrity into a great business: NeighborGoods. Also, have I mentioned that I’m smitten with her? She showed up later that night at a nearby bar and we chatted. If I didn’t have to deliver a drink to a friend I would have asked her out. Damn. Wait, maybe she’s reading this. Micki, if you’re reading this I’m the handsome, charming, bearded Latin guy you met at that bar after DIY Days.  Hit me back and maybe we could grab a burger and shake soon.

The Eisenstadt Experience
Dan Mirvish talked about stuff but I had to step out for a breather as I was drowning in information.

Phew, what a jammed packed night. If Lance or The Workbook Project or DIY Days come to your town, don’t miss out.

Micki, I’m looking forward to hearing from you.

;)

DIY Days LA 2009: Getting Ready – 19. November, 2009

Tonight The Workbook Project is sponsoring DIY Days in Downtown Los Angeles.

Did you just think that I spoke Klingon? Allow me to decipher. The Workbook Project is the brainchild of Lance Weiler. It’s a way for Lance to bring tech to the entertainment folk so they see that the two are more like peanut butter and chocolate, not oil and water.

DIY Days are seminars held to help foster the bridge building.

Tonight, there’ll be a series of talks at the Downtown Independent Theater (never been, excited to check out the space).

What am I looking forward to at DIY Days LA? I’m looking to be inspired. I’m looking for ways to empower myself when I go out with my feature and for new methods to engage with the potential audience of my way overdue web series.

Here’s the schedule.

DIYDays_Schedule

Here are the speakers.

DIYDays_Speakers

Hope to see you there.

Filmmaker Forum 2009 – 12. October, 2009

This past weekend I attended the 2009 Filmmaker Forum, an examination of the ever changing face of independent film hosted by Film Independent. What follows is a fuzzy recounting of my weekend.

Saturday

While Jeremy Thomas has had a successful and varied career, his speech was neither an in-depth examination of the indie film industry nor was it a forecast of the impending doom and the blue skies to follow. it wasn’t terrible but it won’t set the blogosphere afire. Saturday’s highlights were:

1) Linda Lichter. As a panelist, she was frank and honest and always cut through the bulls**t. She also always reminded the other panelist that while their version of indie was a $5 million film with Luke Wilson, most of us  were making films for less than a million, often less than a $100k. Linda, if you’re reading this, I want to tell you that you’re a rock star (too bad I already have an awesome lawyer).

2) Peter Broderick. While every other panel should have been titled “why indie film sucks and it’ll only get harder for you” Peter actually brought us hope and inspiration. He told us that we can still make our films and find an audience. Is it harder than ever? Yes, of course, but the tools are there for us to shape out destiny. Thanks, Peter.

3) Lizzie Gillett. First, she crowd-funded a documentary. Second, she had a virtual world premiere where both Moby and Thom Yorke played. Third, she appeared via Skype from the UK. Fourth, I think she’s really cute and she might be single.

4) Richard Klubeck. If he quits the industry, NPR should pick him up. He has a great radio voice.

5) Ron Yerxa. Did a great job moderating a panel plus he was impeccably dressed. As the weekend progressed I realized he wears the same uniform but I still give him points for trying.

Sunday

I was a bit more out of it this day. I’ll get into that in a bit but here were my highlights

1) “Distribution Case Studies”, “Day & Date: Three Years and Counting” and “New Uses for Film Festivals” panels. These were lively panels and I actually knew two of the panelists (Steak House & Jon Reiss). During each discussion, panelists started interrupting each other, correcting each other, throwing down. In short, it was the perfect kick in the ass to a sleepy Sunday.

2) The following quote constitutes a highlight: “international pre-sales for indies aren’t dead. You bring me an action thriller with Jason Statham and I’ll get you a ton of money out of Germany.” BTW, that was said sincerely and with a straight face.

3) Finally using hash tags in Twitter. I still don’t really understand them (Marsha Collier explained them enough to me so that I’m no longer in the dark) but I started using them and suddenly I saw some of the power and scope of Twitter.

4) Seeing my friend Abby and getting to wish her a happy birthday in person.

Meetings

The big difference for me this year versus previous years are the meetings I’d set up. If you read my earlier post, you know I had meetings with a distributor, a CE, an agent and a consultant. So active/charming/fearless was I that I also met with three managers and one more agent. Almost every meeting went well. Sure, not all meetings ended with “send me your stuff”, how could they when, say for example, you only rep directors with Canadian passports, but four of them ended with “send me your stuff.”

Let me repeat: I impressed 4 people enough for them to ask me to send my stuff their way. Will they read/watch my stuff? Probably not; that’ll get farmed out to an assistant or intern, but I got my toe jammed into four doors and I call that a major f**king accomplishment.

Time to rest.

(Ha! Yeah, right. I wish.)

Mini Meetings – 8. October, 2009

Wondering about the radio silence? Yes, I am back from all my travels but I’m also attending the Filmmaker Forum by Film Independent this weekend. It’s a 2-day seminar on the current-yet-always-evolving state of independent film.

I know, I know, you’re saying “attending a seminar shouldn’t preclude you from blogging regularly” but I also I signed up for their IndieLink. Normally an IndieLink is a moderated meet-and-greet between two groups of up-and-comping professionals. For example, they regularly have ones where directors and producers get together with composers.

For the Filmmaker Forum, they’re a bit differnt. This time around they’re 10-minute meetings with industry professionals. I sent in my preferences expecting to maybe get one meeting but probably get shutout.

Imagine my surprise when I scored four big meetings. This Saturday, in the space of one hour, I’m meeting with a distributor, a creative executive, an agent and a hybrid distribution consultant.

Therefore, I’ve been doing my homework for the past few days. I’ve been studying up on the kinds of films they package/sell/distribute. I’ve also been trying to figure out how I want to spend my time with them and how to make their time with me, at the very least, pleasant.

In ten minutes, I have to tell them how awesome I am without coming off as an arrogant or clueless jerk. I also have to tell them about one rad project I’m working on, a project that will prove to them that I’m a filmmaker they should want to track.

I think I have a strategy.

  • For the distributor, I can talk about my recently shot feature, ask what kind of distribution is typical for a film of its size and how I can best position my film (as is) for niche distributors.
  • For the hybrid distribution consultant I can also talk about my feature but I also have a multimedium project (aka, transmedia) that I can mention. I’ll be sure to ask about the possibilities/realities of generating revenue for such a project through non-traditional streams, how to maximize social media exposure and the possibilities of sponsorships (I keep thinking Nerve or Match might be a good fit for my feature).
  • As for the CE, I can talk about my feature as well as these two scripts I’m cooking up; one a twist on the bromance genre and the other a haunted house/possession story.
  • As for the agent, I should cover the aforementioned projects while also talking about my recently completed TERMINATOR: THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES spec and the CHUCK and/or FRINGE spec I’ll write next… but of course I’d rather be directing those shows.
  • I have to engage these people, get their advice and expertise, while pitching myself (and my works, both current and future) without coming off as a desperate creative.

    So, is there something I’m missing? Am I misguided in my logic and approach? What’s your advice?

    Posted in Education, Industry

    Consult This: Music Rights – 11. June, 2009

    Dan Wilcox, KCRW DJ and Music Supervisor, held a small lecture about music rights for movies at Film Independent and it was… well, here’s what I learned.

  • For a low-budget film, the music supervisor’s salary could be anywhere from $4-10k but that is, like everything else, negotiable.
  • When licensing a pop song, there are two sets of rights to deal with. First, there are the master rights, sometimes called the sync license. This allows you to play the performance. Next, you have to acquire the publishing rights. This allows you to perform the song. Confused? Let’s use “All Along The Watchtower” as an example. Bob Dylan wrote the song so you need to secure the publishing rights from him. But let’s also say you want to use the Jimi Hendrix version so you need a sync license from his estate.
  • Sometimes you can acquire rights as a step deal where you pay a small fee for each step (festivals, theatrical, DVD, etc.). According to Dan, this is almost always a bad idea. You’ll end up paying more in the end and distributors will treat you as if you have the plague.
  • Expect to pay 30-50% more if you’re using the song over the opening or closing credits.
  • Two sites you should become acquainted with: BMI and ASCAP.
  • Some labels/publishers/ariststs have a “most favored nations” clause in their contract. This basically says that everyone gets paid the same. Try and talk folks out of this if you plan on using one super popular song. Imagine your film features 9 songs by unknowns. You agree to $5k for each song but there’s a “most favored nations” clause. Now, for your 10th song, you license a Rolling Stones track for $500k. Guess what? Suddenly you’re paying $500k per song for each of the 10 songs.
  • Try using something in the public domain.
  • Truth is, I knew most of this stuff from previous attempts to license pop songs. Those experiences were so painful I’ve had an aversion to licensing popular music since. But who knows, maybe with this next movie I might try it again. There’s this one song I feel I gotta have and, well, what the heart desires, right?

    On a final note, let me leave you with one of Dan’s sets.

    Shop Talk: Music Videos & Commercials – 14. May, 2009

    Recently FIND held another lecture in their “Shop Talk” series, this time inviting director Chris Milk to speak about working in, and breaking into, the commercial and music video world.

    First, it should be noted that Chris moved backwards through these industries. He first landed in the corporate jungle of Madison Avenue as a commercial director before venturing into the wild west of music videos (why do most directors start with music videos? Because it’s easier to convince a bunch of addle headed musicians that you should direct the video for their third single than it is to convince Murray the used car lot owner to fork over a big chunk of his advertising budget for you to helm his late-night local television spot).

    For reference, here’s a commercial by Chris (a spec ad, I suspect):

    And here’s his video for “Who’s Gonna Save My Soul” by Gnarls Barkley:

    Second, he confirmed everyone’s fears – as the country goes, so do these industries. We all know the music industry has gone to hell. Gone are the days of million dollar music videos. Today, a major band is lucky to get a low six-figure budget for their first single; I know someone that was offered a $10k budget for an effects heavy third single by an artist that’s huge (I mean HUGE) on KROQ. Chris seems to think that the ideal newcomer will not only be able to shoot great footage but will also have the postproduction expertise to make $5k look like $50k.

    Unfortunately commercials, once seen as the safe haven for highly paid helmers, are also seeing their budgets slashed. These days advertising executives are looking for young talent to create viral campaigns. FYI, viral should be defined as “we won’t give you any money so you have to scrounge up the equipment yourself and we want it done in a week.” Chris mentioned that there’s really only one industry that still spends lavish amounts on their commercials — the pharmaceutical industry. Still not deterred? According to Chris there’s one last thing you gotta do: brand yourself. Are you the funny, shaky-cam guy whose work reminds folks of THE OFFICE or are you the guy that can shoot table-top so well that you’ll make all the lactose intolerant Americans rush to their phones, credit cards in hand, when they see your ad for Domino’s new extra cheesy family pizza? Wanna be both? No can do. Production companies are looking for consistency and reliability they can pitch to ad agencies. Want to stretch your creativity? That’s what music videos are for.

    Personally, I’ve always been interested in music videos and commercials. Years ago I pitched like crazy on a rock video but in the end felt like I got screwed by the talent so I gave it up (lesson learned: getting screwed over isn’t personal, it’s strictly business).

    I also had a brush with the commercial industry after winning awards for this, a Philips Electronics spec ad/PSA hybrid:

    At one point I had a Japanese company contacting me, asking me to pitch some ideas for their Pepsi-man campaign. I sent in a few ideas but never heard from them again (lesson learned: while domestic ad agencies might ask a handful of directors to pitch on their boards, foreign companies will invite dozens, if not more, to submit their take).

    I was also told that I should shoot a Coke spec ad. The catch: I’d have to pay for it out my own pocket. Yikes! Not only was spending $30k (I kid you not) of my own money on a spec ad just not a possibility for me, it just felt wrong. I thought if I had $30k I should make something personal, not a commercial for a ridiculously wealthy multinational.

    But there I go again talking about “personal” when I should know that it’s strictly business.

    So what now? I’d love to direct a music video and/or commercial. Doing a very low-budget spec ad or video isn’t out of the question but first I think I need to build up my After Effects skills.

    “Consult This: Getting Started In TV – Writers & Directors” – 28. January, 2009

    Part 2 of the last FIND seminar featured a couple of NBC/Universal executives delivering this message: it’s hard for writers and harder for directors to break into TV. They both suggested checking out the NBC diversity website, applying to the Comedy Short Cuts competition and their Writers on the Verge program. They also suggested the directing programs at NBC (a professional must nominate you), CBS and ABC/Disney.

    As they answered questions for the majority of the event, let me highlight a few useful answers.

    1. Have at least 2 TV scripts: one spec of a current TV show and another of an original pilot.
    2. Lower lever comedy staff jobs are all about the jokes. Have great jokes.
    3. You must develop your own personal brand (or as a previous employer once put it, “why do I want to spend 10 hours a day with you?”)
    4. Treat your first meeting like a blind date. You want to impress.

    Enough blogging. Time to get cracking.

    Posted in Education

    “Consult This: Getting Started in TV – Writers & Producers” – 9. January, 2009

    This time Film Independent hosted a seminar concentrating on how writers and producers break into hour-long scripted dramas. Brian Peterson (Co-Executive Producer, SMALLVILLE) gave out a few pointers to would be TV spec writers (like me) between dishing on the brutal truth of writing and producing a network show.  A few of the best tips:

  • You have to be a fast writer. Usually you get 2 weeks to script an episode but 3 days isn’t unheard of.
  • Have no more than 3 lines of action ever. If it starts to look like a block quotation, consider a job with Encyclopedia Britannica.
  • It seems like everyone can write decent dialog (Really? I find that hard to believe.) but they all forget the emotion.
  • Focus on the main characters. This isn’t a minor character’s time to shine.
  • Use every location twice. It shows you know the show and can write within the budget.
  • Don’t have more than 2-3 people per scene. More people means more money spent.
  • Don’t save your best hook for the end of the episode; use it at the end of act one.
  • Don’t try to keep ahead of the show’s weekly developments. Couch you episode in the previous season. This shows you can work within their parameters.
  • Honestly, that last one struck the loudest chord in me. If you’ve been following this blog, you know I’ve been trying to write a spec for TERMINATOR: THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES but have yet to finish it because I’ve been fighting to stay ahead of show. Unfortunately, once I have my spec plotted out, something happens on the show that forces me to alter my structure or my b-story or consider another character or… you get the picture.

    Posted in Education

    “10 Tools for Working with Actors” – 24. April, 2008

    Of all the skills that go into making a film director, working with actors might be the most elusive. While all the other crafts seem like hard science, this one often feels like one of the dark arts. Therefore, it was refreshing to have Adrienne Weiss put on a great directing workshop sponsored by Film Independent.

    Adrienne_Weiss_Wrkshp.gif

    (FYI, Adrienne offers a series of workshops but they aren’t cheap… why is it that directing workshops are always so damn expensive?)

    With her direct and structured approach, Adrienne discussed many stratagems for helping an actor build a layered and nuanced performance. Now, if you’ve ever taken a good directing workshop, you’ve heard everything she has said before (you can find it all in the Judith Weston book) but it’s her approach that kicks ass. She wants to engage, not condescend.

    Honestly, I’d have to say this is a big key to the director-actor relationship. Lord knows the number of times I’ve seen the director play God to his actors (and a vain, vengeful, Old Testament styled God at that). From my experience, this results in the actor shutting down and directing themselves. With a little bit of engagement, the actors will feel respected, they might actually listen to you and there’s a glimmer of hope they might give you what you want (maybe even something better).

    Posted in Directing, Education

    “Tech Talk: Making HD Look Good” – 9. April, 2008

    How do I put this politely? This little lecture by Film Independent was less than, what’s the word I’m looking for, gripping.

    Honestly, I heard it all before (and better). I probably could have learned more by trolling a decent digital cinematography blog.

    Wait, I don’t want to be negative. I’ll just take the advice Thumper got…

    Posted in Education